Women Moving the Edge
Ten days ago I spent almost four days with eight other women engaging in a bizarre evolutionary passtime called moving the edge. To the extent that we knew what we were letting ourselves in for, we were prepared for anything. That’s what being on the edge is about. We soon learned that our edges were very different.

So what is "The" edge? Judy and Ria blogged about our process at the time, as they perceived it. I was too busy being in the process, witnessing, engaging in my own form of visual harvesting, and being flat out exhausted at the end of the day to write anything much at the time. But a number of things happened, as far as I could see.
Firstly, I realised almost as it was happening that we were going through the different stages of community building described by Scott Peck in his book "A different drum". This process, it seems to me, cannot be faked or staged. It can only be gone through. I wonder whether it is true to say that if it hasn’t been gone through, there can be no "true community". All I can say is that once we got through it, the quailty of our being together was totally different. The photo you see above was taken at the end of our time together. I think that shows.
Secondly, I was suprised at how much time I spent in my "wrathful" manifestation. Particularly in calling out the "shadow of feminine green". This is what I journalled at the time:
"There’s fire and rebellion in me. Wrathful Dakini. I can’t believe how stifled I feel by the group’s norms. The monster political correctness in feminine guise. It’s all too nice, it’s all too respectful - paying lipservice to depth. And all the while, consensus prevents anyone from being authentic.
"What would a group be like in which each person could be fully who we are and free to express ourselves in our own way? I’m very aware of the shortcomings of language to express what has been happening here. Fire hits the green swamp. What is the world asking us to do? The question might be too big for Action Learning (that attempt fizzled out mid-process, usurped by the abdicated leadership and not defended by the others). But it’s not to big to respond to: it’s asking us to evolve. Because from our current level we can’t help. We can only continue to contribute to the problem."
Thirdly, what happened - in terms of Theory U - was that half way through the third day we finally slipped "through the eye of the needle" at the bottom of the U curve, and entered a collective space which I can only describe as mysterious, enlightened grace. We all felt it. The best explanation I have found so far of this phenomenon comes from Otto Scharmer himself: " Going through the eye of the needle is a threshold experience that happens at the bottom of the U at "point zero" between the downward and the upward path. The eye-of-the-needle experience has been described as "birth" or "breaking through a membrane." Going through the eye of the needle is better understood in terms of what it does to the nature of the individual-collective relationship. The essence and, to some extent the mystery, of the eye-of-the-needle experience is a very subtle switch in how individuals relate to the collective whole of the community (or team or organization) they are part of."
As this happened, we more or less spontaneously organised ourselves into a systemic constellation around a question which had been snagging our attention the whole time: What is it that the world’s leaders need in order to take the next step in opening doors for planetary healing? You can read some of the story of the constellation here. I’ll be posting up more insights elsewhere when I’ve finished harvesting them. The long and short of it, after the constellation we spent the last 24 hours of our time together as a "circle being".
Lastly, something about leadership. I just by chance came across a small piece on leadership by Martin Ludvigsen which sums up perfectly what we experienced. In answer to the question "What is a leader?":
"A leader engages leadership.
"Leadership should be seen as an occurrence that is not necessarily tied to a person. The best groups work where leadership is shared. The person taking leadership at any given time is the one with a strong intention towards moving forward or any other image of the future.
"All this demands some kind of collective intelligence or respect for the dynamic of a group. When this is misunderstood leadership becomes someone’s and then the doors are open for power struggles and ego-battles.
"The leader is the person IN leadership. This requires that he or she is speaking for the community that is led.
"If you want to be a leader for the sake of being on top of someone else, then this will probably lead to sickness in your organization since you act from personal ego, insecurity and the lust for power for power sake.
"If you want to be a leader because you want to move the world - the only thing you must do, as i see it, is to be constantly awake and stay on the edge of your own existence and the world.
"If you are not at the edge why should you be a leader?"
In our case, the first step was when the two original conveners of the group relinquished leadership to the group. The ensuing chaos was then held by these two women (an act of leadership nonetheless) until the voice of leadership recognisably spoke through one of the other women. From then on, the voice moved from throat to throat most organically. It made me think of a small furry creature that crept from lap to lap around the circle as the energy drew it.
The hardest thing, now that our Circle Being has moved into the past, is to know what to do with what happened. My sense is that every time a group comes together and moves beyond being a collection of disparate egos to speak from the middle, in that space beyond individuality (which won’t happen just because we want it to - there seems to be a mysterious movement of grace involved), we are making it easier for it to happen next time. Laying down the groove that will become the next stage in the evolution of human consciousness. Which - it is becoming clear to those that inquire into this question - will be a collective one. So in that sense, we don’t have to do anything. We did it while we were together. The Circle Being fulfilled its Circle Task.

The content of our inquiry and insights are also important, however. And they won’t survive unless we move with them out into the world. That is part of my commitment now. To chronicle what we spoke about. It’s feels hard, sometimes, being a working mum with school-aged kids and a full-time day job, when my larger life is calling me to evolutionary agency that I have no choice but to say "YES" to. I spent all of last week popping in and out of overwhelm - feeling the urgency of getting down my insights before they fade, while being continually yanked back into "now and next week" by said day job. And all the while, the newly acquired commitments of ongoing life keep on piling up. It would be good to be able to go off-line sometimes, to step off the timeline to recount what is happening at the speed of life all around.
We all came to the gathering with different expectations of what would happen. Mine had to do with moving beyond the tension between our individual selves, lives, pain, journeys, stories and agendas to become the collective organism that we could be, together, for a short while, to pool our separate sensory strengths in service to a collective inquiry that would be timely and to the benefit of the greater whole. At the time, I wrote "We women can get caught up in the particular, so letting go into the general might also be a challenge to us. In this global inquiry, we shall be using our bodies as sensory organs of a single organism. We can succeed in this only to the extent that our own bodies don’t also have to process our own personal, individual, ego stuff. Can we leave that outside the circle for an hour or two?" In the end we managed a whole 24 hours. There was clarity, energy, humour, spaciousness, fluency, humility, boldness, lightness, courage, inspiration and grace. If this is what happens when people make it through the eye of the needle, then there is hope for the human race.







I can't help but leave a few words here.
Thank you so much for sharing this. I've been fortunate enough to be a part of any number of Community Building circles, and you've described, so brilliantly, that strange feeling of falling in collective love, with all the pain and difficult rawness that comes with that process. This entire piece was wonderful, the sort of thing that I'd love to curl up with a cup of tea and speak with you about, especially that final question.
Because it is always poignant, when a group dies. Even if something of the spirit of the group is carried on in the individuals that continue, the circle itself is over, and practicing the ability to be with that loss is, for me, of tremendous value. Also, I think you expressed something so true when you wrote about the grace that enables future births of new circles and communities to become easier. It's all practice.
Thank you again, though, deeply. I loved this post.
Truly touched by your response, Siona. Did you look at the pictures? I find that they help keep the spirit present.
That said, this flowing through heights and depths, and the practice of holding everything that arises in the vastest possible consciousness and listening with exquisite attention to the signals delivered by our bodies about the otherwise unseen undercurrents of the mysterious We that tetra-arises with the I and the it.
It is, indeed, all practice.
Magnificant entry, Helen!
Wonderful, profound, challenging and even beyond edge..maybe bleeding edge, as some technologists would say…
Thx for this gift!
Albert
thank you helen,
reminded me of the series of circles I did a while ago, describing the first one (not that the following ones weren't as great) as hieros gamos, divine marriage… because that's what it is, isn't it? Only I never had the luxury to stay in that circle being for such a long time; what a deep blessing!
This being also can 'pop up' - as it were - in meetings with friends; in a way it appeared when talking with Jorge Ferrer who was here in Prag this weekend, and during his workshop yesterday. I think indeed, once one has experienced the 'circle being' one is open to also experiencing gradations of this 'between-us' in every heart-open being together with others. To me it always feels as if the whole background to me-and-you-being is turning to light; a kind of “golddust is in the air.”
And also, your deep insights won't disappear… this I know for sure; maybe their expressions changes (you might never use these words or metaphors again that come up for you now) but the 'essence' of the between-us will be there for you always - I'm sure. I still can re-member (almost in the literal sense) the very first community building event I ever participated in, and that was 15 years ago almost.
Hieros gamos is 'made in heaven', and even if the direct connection is severed the 'invisible connection' is here to stay.
Thank you for bringing this into the foreground again!
Thanks, Mu. I sense that you are right. I love the gold dust. Makes me think of Peter Pan's fairy dust that makes children fly.
And you're right about recognising others who know that between-us. Laying down the groove. It puts a whole new spin on the concept of “grooving”! And I'm sure looking forward to groovin' with you!
Judy wrote:
Helen,
I very much appreciate the depth of your harvesting our time at Women Moving the Edge. I continue to realize mini harvests - and maybe that is part of how we integrate over time these new grooves as they become part of each of us. And likely the context for each is different and multiple harvests emerge. And that makes it so fascinating and exciting.
After reading your reflections, a couple of thoughts came about GREEN and our basking there. You were seeing how we paralyze ourselves, get caught there. In our comfort with niceness or personal feelings and connection we lose authenticity. So I thought about that a little more. If we are still centered primarily in GREEN (at least as well-educated spiritually-oriented caring Western women), then where are the doorways, the cracks, to something more? Where are the tipping points, the openings? So I offer some possibilites that I noticed. These are really small and potential evolutionary cracks.
We had a practice of using a talking piece to guide the flow of our conversation. It slowed down the process, allowed everyone to speak, made silent spaces, opened space for listening, and created intervals, spaces between. It often seems artifical. Is it the only way ? Likely not. But as we learn to move into collective being, to become a Circle Being, it seems to be one way to create more opening, more space. Is spontaneity lost? Is authenticity lost? Would certain people dominate without this process? Lots of questions.
Is evolution happening here, or being made possible in a GREEN context? The process itself is very GREEN. But for evolution to occur we must start in GREEN; we must look at how we engage in the collective process. So how are we each different or not in this context?
I find the idea of authenticity worth pursuing. And along with that I will add selflessness and harmlessness. The creation of a Circle Being, emerging in Grace, is a delicate process, it seems. And yet the energy of fire, the state of chaos, and each woman being on the edge and out of her comfort zone must pierce the veil enough to move us forward, beyond the GREEN zone . And those might be very sublte shifts or large bursts.
What your words reminded me of was the discernment and selflessness needed to know when to step back, to “hold back”. What is authentic for one of us, may be very different for others. We do not come equally to the circle. And that is where the evolutionary potential lies. What is authentic expression to one, may be harmful to another. I think we saw that sometimes holding back, respecting the dignity of another, a form of “wise caution” is the right thing in the moment. I saw you do that. That requires discernment and relinquishing of personal agenda. And I also sensed your resistance. It seemed out of the norm for you, but then out of your comfort zone. But in that moment something in you said don't take this further. There was allowing of another to continue; to not be interrupted. She was given her place in that moment, whether it resonated for you or not.
So is this just adherence to GREEN or possibly an opening? I offer this as an example of one of the doorways of engagement into the collective, an opening into higher consciousness. In the moment, we must discern, unemotionally, with wholeness and clarity. If need be, one steps out of the way. Authenticity meets harmlessness. Ego meets selflessness. And there I think likes the potential shift. Inner knowing, in the moment, in the context, prevails. Cultivating this is certainly an edge.
And I acknowledge that its mirror side is also an edge. If holding back is the comfort zone, and in the moment discernment and inner knowing ask for shaking things up, then that is the opening then. It requires each of us to be fully present in each moment, on the edge of our own discomfort, letting go of self, being authentic, and discerning the pattern of the whole system and the needs of all of its parts. Then we can act with integrity.
I appreciate the opportunity to reflect and to try to articulate my thinking. I sense that is part of our great challenge - to help evolutionary consciousness to come into form, to be expressed, articulated, to be put into words. To come into understanding.
In gratitude,
Judy
Dear Helen, Judy,
we definitely must pass the inauthentic phase, which is governed by this rule - a very GREEN rule, I think: ”Don’t say or do anything that could hurt someone. If somebody says anything that irritates or annoys you, act as if nothing has happened or as if it hasn’t really touched you. If differences of opinions arise, change the topic.” People speak in generalities, and let others get away with it.
It is indeed true what you say, Judy, “What is authentic expression to one, may be harmful to another.” The trouble is, of course, that we don't know beforehand if something is truly harmful or may be just the really deeply touching thing to say.
Maybe I'm a bit too radical in this, but “holding something back, respecting the dignity of another” - this we only truly know after the fact. In the heat of the moment we have to play it by the 'ear of the heart'… and there are no rules, it seems.
You see I experience it as debasing if you hold back your authentic response to 'protect' me in some way, even if it is my dignity - for what is my dignity if it needs the protection against you speaking your heart and mind?
I think we all to easily protect ourselves againt a necessary phase in this process that authenticity does bring, that of confusion and chaos… The confusion seems to result from the awareness of being separated from others, not yet feelingly coming from the sense of true and authentic community; so one asserts oneself and defends ones positions and opinions. In confusion one strives only to create a better constellation or “version” of already known forces and situations - a willingness to authentically change would put the foundation of ones security and safety at risk.
And it has to be put at risk.
Consideration, respect, selflessness does help - but it also has to be put at risk. In this phase we truly have to put our heart and soul on the line…
Or the group tries to escape from this confusion of separation. This “escapism” has many faces, among others the desire to control, to organise things; the groups looks for leaders, The hope is, of course, that someone or some happening - an illumination or insight - will allow one to escape from confusion, and the fear is that it will not happen (but both struggle and escape don't help, so the fear is well based). All of this is to
avoid the uncomfortable step into the dark Unknown that needs to be taken by everyone if the 'circle being' or true community is to emerge.
And all of these phases can go on simultaneously - the whole process really is out of control.
I really appreciate the reflections on all of this, because within the struggle to avoid and the struggle to not avoid, within the inner conflict of respecting one's own boundaries and those of the others and at the same time to let go into unbounded openness, this tension and the sadness that we cannot make the most beautiful and essential thing happen… within this paradoxical matrix we co-create the possibility of the appearance of true community: visible, strong, heartfelt…
Thank you for sharing and awakening all of this understanding in me.
Love & Peace,
Mushin
Judy, Mu, I would have liked to respond earlier, but I've been busy getting stressed out with living…
So instead I've been holding your reflections, and savouring them. What comes up for me now, this Friday evening after a tiring week and having just put the kids to bed…
Community is valuable to me to the extent that it can be more than the sum of its parts for an evolutionary purpose. Community as a feel-good factor for my ego doesn't work. It's true that during our time together I got a strong polarity response to all that green cocooning in a context where we were claiming to seek and move the edge. That could indeed have been the shadow side of something, but my wrathful expression often comes from a different place - through me but not from me.
I realise that I really am not interested in being easy on people, or avoiding them feeling hurt. If I'm not coming from a malevolent place, I don't think I'll hurt them. I am ever more strongly driven by a vision of the next evolutionary wave, where human adults reach a stage of construct-awareness/ego-awareness that is as different from the egoic sleepwalking of the first-tier grooves as a child who has been potty trained is from a new-born. Living with a constant awareness of the constructs in my mental space and those of others, I find it harder and harder to see why I should spend my energy trying not to disturb the slumbers of the adults around me, tiptoeing around their egoic sensibilities as if they were real and valid.
Sooner or later I'll probably get clobbered by somebody for being careless, but as long as I am acting from an authentic place (my main practice these days is ruthlessness with my own ego-clinging phoney spaces) then I am addressing the depths of the other, that are without question deserving of respect and truth. “I have always been on your side, but you did not always know it”…
Today's been rather wierd - and I'm interested to see how things unfold. Early this morning I had an experience in the dream space (it wasn't a dream, because I was awake, but it happened in the dreamspace). My consciousness suddenly expanded massively, just went on pushing out further and further, and I kind of let go into the vast infinity, let go of the last strands of holding back and fell forwards into the luminous void. This morning when I went to meditate, the same thing happened straight away. I've kind of been in that space all day, and some really strange things have happened. Extraordinary interactions with colleagues, deep connections with total strangers…
I echo your sentiment, Mu: thank you for sharing and awakening all of this understanding in me…
Deeply inspiring post and comments.
“I realise that I really am not interested in being easy on people, or avoiding them feeling hurt. If I’m not coming from a malevolent place, I don’t think I’ll hurt them.”
Yes, yes, and yes. thank you dear Helen, for all that you share, all that you are.